Duty and Responsibility

TO The Office Of The High Commissioner For

International Human Rights (OHCHR) 
Palais Des Nations 
1211 Geneva 10 
Switzerland By certified USPS mail Art . # 7017- 3380 3380- 0000-7085- 6661

Dear Sir or Mdm.

I am submitting communication: as the author’s own behalf being hereafter identified as George Edward McDermott Sr. hereafter petitioner, nationality US citizen born June 12, 1945 presently residing 143 N. Huron Dr., Forest Heights, MD 20745 and on behalf of my family and also on behalf of tens of millions of US citizens subject to being a citizen of a member states hereafter Respondent’s. Petitioner Who is subject to ongoing ever enlarging political/ judicial tyranny and political corruption in our nations legal system which is subject to international law based on treaties entered into by previous legislators/ member respondents state operating as United States of America Inc. With Washington DC as its capital where our 79th congresses of the United States of America Inc. Entered into and specific treaties regarding international human rights GUARANTEES wherein respondent state is NOW in DIRECT violation of. December 9th 1945 International Organization Immunities Act WHICH relinquished every public office of the United States to the United Nations. See 22 CFR 92.12-92.31 FR Heading “Foreign Relationship”

1. High Commissioner I am contacting your office as a citizen of the respondents incorporated state trading as the United States of America Inc. which is listed as a member state as of January 1, 2018 being 1 of the 107 member states . High Commissioner After reading recent article in the Washington Post newspaper 8 section page 18 published May 20, 2018 in the Amanda Mellet case which clearly indicates that citizens of signing states can lawfully petition the commission for relief when petitioner and others legal rights liberties and property have been illegally seized or withheld from them by the preponderance states in direct violation of the December 1945 International organization immunities act. I am submitting this formal request for assistance.

2. As a petitioner I will follow the format laid out in the commission’s Model Complaint Form.

Petitioner is making this complaint not only on behalf of himself and his family but also on behalf of the victims deceased of the rights as interviewed at the respondents court systems whose stories are posted@secretjustice.com where there are + 1180 programs showing a pattern of abuse, deprivation of legal rights, deprivation of civil rights, false imprisonment by sham court’s of respondents states engaged in theft of homes businesses and properties by state actors who have overtaken our state nations court system under fraudulent and sham pretenses violating UN treaties our Constitution and Bill of Rights Both Respondent State And Respondent Federal Actors.

3. Petitioner’s Concerns being brought to THE OFFICE OF HIGH COMMISSIONER AND TO THE OFFICE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL reporting violation of the petitioners and others rights by respondent states officers for the past 23 years, Petitioner’s complaint is supported by his fact-finding backed up by petitioners 18,000 docket entries involving over 120 court cases evidencing petitioner’s legal efforts trying to protect and preserve the legal and human rights of petitioners and his family not to mention untold numbers of victims who have been illegally deceased of the property and legal rights by alleged named and unnamed officers of the court of United States of America Inc. respondents and the 50+ state private corporate court’s operating as for profit businesses across the North American continent insider respondents, now operating with complete disrespect to the rule of law and their oath of office. Which appear to bind respondents state agents to the international laws and statutes published. SEE. December 9th 1945 International Organization Immunities Act relinquished every public office of the United States to the United Nations. 22 CFR 92.12-92.31 FR Heading “Foreign Relationship”states that an oath is required to take office.
4. Petitioner now formally states for the record that the complaint/petition asserts that the incorporated Respondent state of United States of America Inc. and its sworn corporate officers in their legislative and judicial capacities and knowingly with evil intent and purpose acted to deliberately breach intent and purpose of the 79th Congress authorization of U.N. treaty agreements outlined under Title 8, 22 & 28 USC which in December 26th 1933 49 Statute 3097 Treaty Series 881 (Convention on Rights and Duties of States) stated CONGRESS replaced STATUTES with international law known as by this body Universal Declaration of Human Rights (19 4 8 ) specific allegations include signature states/respondents agents and willful violations articles enumerated under this treaty activating this body’s jurisdiction.

4 – A. Model complaint form states one should identify convention articles allegedly violated by respondents and/or their agents supporting petitioner’s claim relief from this body according to rules.

4 – B. Petitioner asserts that evidence both from court records of the respondent states archived in the US and Maryland archives art irrefutable evidence of the discriminatory practices of the respondent states agents assignments and officers failure to perform honest services and protect the legal and human rights of the petitioner, his family, and 90+ percent of all victims of the discriminatory practices of the respondents agents court of law and equity. Section violated are as follows.

B – 1. Article violated Article 1 which states that All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. Respondent state actors discriminate against all unincorporated minorities and disadvantaged individuals being victimized by corporate and white-collar crimes. See supporting evidence.

B – 2. Article violated Article 2 which states that Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration. State actors discriminate against petitioner and 97.46% of all citizens attempting to exercise their rights in the state court lawfully under 28 USC 1654 by setting up a class-based system favoring corporations over natural citizens. See supporting evidence.

B – 3. Article violated Article 3 which states that Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person. Respondents are not upholding their legal responsibility recording to their oath of office 1180 programs a test to a video record of respondents states abuse of process and discriminatory practices see supporting evidence. Videos posted@secretjustice.com programs 01 through 1180 under best evidence.

B – 4. Article violated Article 4 which states that No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms. Respondents state actors failure to perform honest services is subjected petitioner and millions of others to debt slavery while stealing their property and allowing court insiders to use of forged falsified affidavits and court documents as well as unsigned orders. See supporting evidence over 100,000,000 Americans are presently debt slaves to corporate insiders. See evidence presented

B – 5. Article violated Article 6 which states Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law. Respondent submitted this impossibility by declaring 97.46% of all pro se litigant actions at law finding in favor of corporate lawyers and corporate banks using forged documents, falsified notaries, and unsigned orders from appellate court which court will not authenticate or validate. See evidence presented

B – 6. Article violated Article 8 which states Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law the. Respondent states have made this impossibility for natural citizens to receive justice in our nations court with the court protect its agents and insiders falsely asserting lack of jurisdiction denying 90% of our citizens access to the court. Plus only 2% of 2% of citizens demanding jury trial are ever allowed See evidence presented.

B – 7. Article violated Article 9 which states No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile. Respondents agents and states arbitrary arrest pro se litigants and other citizens pursuing their legal rights in court through phony psych evaluations and confinement in mental institutions to protect corporate insiders and lawyers stealing their property and the vesting citizens of their legal right to free access in America see supporting evidence.

B – 8. Article violated Article 10 which states Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him. Petitioner’s record supplied to this court and memorialized in the archives of the United States of America in Maryland state respondents controlled repositories clearly show the respondents agents are not acting in conformance with this article 90% plus of all disadvantage litigants are subject to economic terrorism by the respondents court and their agents acting in conflict with U.N. treaty agreements see evidence presented.

B – 9. Article violated Article 13.1 + 14.1 which states Article 13 1. Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each State. 2. Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country. Petitioner asserts that the public record shows that the member state/respondents agents have enacted independent arbitrary rules to prevent this fundamental human rights protection from being preserved and protected as you and laws require see supporting evidence.

B – 10. Article violated Article 17.1 which state, Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others. 2. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property. Petitioner asserts that 23+ years the respondents courts have engaged in the theft of property of the petitioner and over 70,000,000 other Americans as respondents agent cover-up for their fellow bar members, unlicensed debt collectors, and CORPORATE Banks, and their agents war against the unrepresented minority and disadvantaged classes of citizens in violation of their oath of office. See supporting evidence.

B – 11. Article violated Article 28 which state, Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized. Once again respondents actions against the petitioner and millions of other Americans citizens protected under our Constitution and Bill of Rights are being deceased of their property, their legal rights, and access to justice due to respondents agents failure to honor international treaties supporting the rule of law and international human rights.

B – 12. Article violated Article 30 which state, Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein, petitioner asserts that the respondents and their agents have acted in conflict with the terms and conditions of the treaty entered into by the 79th Congress of the United States violating its intent and purpose necessitating this bodies intervention on behalf of petitioner and 100,000,000 Americans plus being disenfranchised of the rights by respondents agents as stated. . Ratification is a State’s formal expression of consent to be bound by a treaty. Only a State that has previously signed the treaty (during the period when the treaty was open for signature) can ratify it. Ratification consists of two procedural acts: on the domestic level, it requires approval by the appropriate constitutional organ (usually the head of State or parliament).

5. Petitioner reinstates for the record and has outlined 12 different articles [B – 1 through 12] which the respondents have violated in violation of UN treaty of 1945 enacted by the 97th Congress petitioner to move on with the evidence supporting petition as the petitioner is a victim of economic terrorism by respondents agents the vast majority of evidence supporting petition is available to reviewers through the electronic medium regarding federal proceedings the pacer system allows for panel members to access hundreds of thousands of pages filed electronically in the case is to be cited, additionally state of Maryland uses the Maryland Judiciary case search.com to review the dockets and the MDEC - Maryland Electronic Courts files also allows for electronic viewing of documents from remote locations as petitioner did not want to burden the staff of the High Commissioner or investigative arms with documents and papers which are more filed with the court and part of the archive records of the petitioner and other victims of the respondents ongoing pattern of denial of citizens of their rights afforded under the international human rights commission and tribunal.

6. Model form requires that petitioner comply with Sec. III, Requires Exhaustion of domestic remedies/Application to other international procedures. Petitioner in 1998 made a petition to the court of international justice receiving back unsigned order stating lack of jurisdiction. Petitioner has exhausted every legal remedy in the respondents court over the last 23 years over 120 court cases 18,000 docket entries plus and 1100+ movies and postings @ secretjustice.com also@georgemcdermott.com additionally @marylandcourtwatch.com and georgemcdrmott2018.com. As a means of educating my fellow citizens as to our judicial crisis.

 

7. Petitioner additionally states that an records will show petitioner has petitioned every judge in the Maryland Court Of Appeals, Maryland Court Of Special Appeals, the United States District Court for Maryland, for the District of Columbia, the Eastern and Western districts of Virginia, the United States courts of appeals for the Federal Circuit, United States Court of Appeals for the DC circuit, Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, the court of federal claims for Washington DC, the administrative offices from Maryland court, every member of the Maryland house and Senate in Annapolis state legislature, every member of the United States House of Representatives DC offices, every member of the US Senate DC offices, the offices of the Inspector General for the Department of Justice, office of the Inspector General for the FBI, the office of the US attorneys offices Baltimore Maryland, Alexandria Virginia, Washington DC at petitioner’s own cost and expense by US first-class mail seeking a question of law be answered and bringing to these respective parties as docket entries will shall allegations of treason against the Constitution and fraud on the respective courts by officers and agents abusing their oath of office. 2 conflict cruel and inhuman punishment against victim’s exercising their rights guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution and the international tribunal’s human rights laws as outlined in [P. 4A – B –1 through 12]. No response has been forthcoming finally the petitioner petition the office of the President of the United States as Chief Executive Officer of the private for-profit corporation operating as the

High Commissioner

Out of an abundance of caution am also sending by certified mail a copy of this correspondence to your Complaint Procedure Unit Human Rights Council Branch Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights United Nations Office at Geneva 
CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland as the matters I bring before you are not being addressed by the leadership of the United States of America incorporated as a requirement under the treaties entered into outlined under Title 8, 22 & 28 USC which in December 26th 1933 49 Statute 3097 Treaty Series 881 (Convention on Rights and Duties of States) stated CONGRESS replaced STATUTES with international law, placing all states under international law. December 9th 1945 International Organization Immunities Act.

FINALLY IS THIS TREATY STILL IN EFFECT AND IF SO WHY HAS OUR GOVERNMENT FAILED TO INFORM OUR CITIZENS

WE ARE UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW. ????

United States of America incorporated for which president Donald Trump responded May 22, 2018 pledging to uphold American values which one must also believe is integrity of our court system and the UN treaties on international legal and human rights as he himself is also an oath taker subject to the international treaty which no one can prove to this citizen that the treaty has never been rescinded and must be the rule of law.[Emphasis on presidential communication]

 


Statement and Purpose    
Staying True to your Principles    
Duty and Responsibility
Don't be Fooled by Courts and Judges    
Let Corporate America Know    
What you don't know about our courts
Victim Stories    
 
Facebook   twitter    SecretJustice.com